At first glance, AI-generated images dazzle with their polished aesthetics—vibrant colors, intricate details, and styles that mimic famous artists or futuristic visions. Yet, the closer you look, the more flaws emerge: distorted hands, unnatural lighting, or surreal landscapes that defy physics. And every tweak to the prompt or setting reveals new imperfections, turning what started as fun into a frustrating quest for the unattainable.


Of course all of the above is plain rubbish. AI has never done anybody any harm. It’s a great hobby, it gives sound advice, it can even be a life line.
All the more so because all it says and does has — one way or another — been said before. It has been thoroughly vetted and screened. It represents a time-tested and democratically sanctioned reality.
But even when an image seems flawless, it often lacks the soul of human-created art. AI excels at remixing patterns, but it doesn’t feel—it doesn’t capture the accidental brushstroke or the emotional weight behind a photograph. For hobbyists, this can be both thrilling and maddening: a tool that promises limitless creativity but delivers a hall of mirrors, where every reflection is slightly off.

The closer you look, the more disconcerting it can be.
And still — this is what we are all about!
FROM THE BLOG

I think if it’s sunny it can’t be all bad.

Robots? Why Robots It’s what I ask myself. If I remember correctly, it wasn’t my idea. NightCafé was the one one who brought it up: They kindly offer prompts that you — the user — might like and…

I think they’ll be saying something like this: It’s Monkey Day, what will we do? Let’s just do Monkey Things. But we do Monkey Things every day … That’s reason to celebrate then! And so, a celebration it…